Author Archives: admin
Letter to BOC – 1/8 – Lifecycle Cost Benefit Analysis
Letter below sent to township Board of Commissioners after attending today’s ‘curbside chat’ where Charles Marohn from Strongtowns.org advocated for developing in a fiscally sustainable way. This is one tool I have personally advocated for over the past two years.
Gentleman,
Please once again see attached “Cradle to Cradle” cost benefit analysis of the Jaindl Project and please note it was presented to the board approximately 2 years ago. I also did personally about a year ago via public comment.This particular lifecycle analysis focused on the total costs to residents of the various waivers/exceptions granted in the MOU. In general these are the concepts that Charles Marohn talked about in today’s ‘curbside chat’. Including the ongoing costs of infrastructure and services. This strategy can and should be applied to all large scale development projects.Simply put, usage of this tool or something simliar shows when development offers ROI on taxpayer investment and when it does not. This is the crux of what I have always questioned about the negotiated MOU and ongoing development projects in the township.About the analysis: This was well thought out and researched but please note it does contain assumptions. The point however was to illustrate a process which was never done here in the township to my knowledge. Moving forward from the MOU this process needs to be implemented on future projects.Please consider adding cost benefit analysis of all greenfield and large scale development projects into the scope of the smart growth review. This is one of the philosophical issues that frames the way we grow which in turn influences the patterns.Thank youRon Beitler
Guest Blogged on Renew LV “Crossroads” blog!
Guest blogged on RenewLV crossroads blog. Check it out here! Wrote about tomorrow mornings ‘Curbside Chat’ with the Strongtowns.org organization. Renew Lehigh Valley (RenewLV) is a smart growth organization working to strengthen the region’s core communities, preserve open space, and create a sustainable and equitable foundation for future growth.
The Strongtowns message has been the foundation of my interest in smart growth. At it’s core smart growth is a fiscally conservative policy that addresses the fundamental issue of fiscal sustainability. Simply put, new development should produce a return on taxpayer investment in infrastructure and services. I look forward to hearing the message in the context of Lower Macungie Township.
What: Curbside Chat
When: Jan 9th 8am
Where: Lower Macungie Township Municipal building.
Local Gov’t 101 – What is a Zoning Hearing Board
The Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Macungie was in the news recently. This is the second in a continuing series outlining local government in the greater East Penn area and how you can get involved in the decision making process!
The Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) is a “quasi-judicial” board that rules on requests for exceptions to the zoning ordinance. The Board also hears appeals from the decisions of the zoning officer. The zoning ordinance is the code of rules that outline what you can and can’t do with your property. The purpose is to protect the rights of landowners but also neighbors and the community at large. For example, if you live in a residential neighborhood, it’s supposed to protect you from someone coming in and building a warehouse adjacent to your property. The ZHB is not responsible for the content of a zoning ordinance but only the interpretation of the ordinance. It’s easy to see why appointments to this board are so important.
Boards consist of three regular members and alternate members, all of whom are residents of the municipality. Members are appointed by the governing board. The board must assure fair and equitable administration of the zoning ordinance. Though the board has some discretion in a township it is bound to the Municipal Planning Code.
All local municipalities in Pa with zoning ordinances have Zoning Hearing Boards. Macungie Borough, Alburtis Borough, Emmaus and Lower Macungie all have their own. Each governing body appoints officers.
Developers, business owners and residents can request relief. In large greenfield development project it isnt uncommon for developers to requests dozens of exceptions. A ZHB must exhibit caution to ensure relief is only granted in cases where it does not harm the general public.
Examples of recent topics during hearings in LMT:
- A restaurant requested relief for an outdoor dining project.
- A resident requested relief to build a fence in restricted flood plane.
- Hamilton Crossings requested a variance allowing for up to 80% impervious cover. (Parking lots, roads, sidewalks and buildings where rainwater cannot seep directly into the ground)
- Panera Bread requested a variances to allow for a drive through.
To receive an exception from zoning rules, an applicant must prove a “hardship” that warrants “relief”.
The ZHB is a critical part of municipal government. Appointments should be taken very seriously. Decisions made play a crucial role in the development and growth of a town.
Learn more about:
What is the role of a Township Board of Commissioners
Coming soon.
What is the role of a Borough Council/Mayor – Alburtis, Macungie, Emmaus.
What is the role of a Planning Commission
What are the roles of professional staff – Zoning Officers, Planners, Managers ect.
Roles of community Groups – How to get involved! Senior Groups, CEPTA, EPIC, Friends LMT, CFC, Historical Commission ect. ect.
Church Lane Bridge to remain Closed
Church Lane Bridge to remain Closed
Bill Erdman, the township’s engineer, said Thursday night that PennDOT issued a directive to keep the bridge closed.
Township commissioners in April announced they were closing the one-lane span due to an influx of traffic during construction on the nearby Spring Creek Road bridge.
MCall.com
LVPC comments on Allen Organ Ordinance
Below are LVPC’s comments on the pending Allen Organ Ordinance. (allowing for apartments in commercial zones, sketch plan shows 75,000 ft supermarket and 200+ apartments)
Concerns seem valid. Interconnectivity is key. Not only inside developments but with exterior roads. This is how you limit the affect on traffic issues. We must stop developing via isolated pods that dump the majority of traffic primarily into large arterial intersections. Unless we want to start looking like Macarther Rd. New developments should have multiple entrances, exits and connections. Both for Pedestrians and Auto. This avoids funneling traffic into single large intersections.
The section reads “Direct access to an arterial road is required…..” which is fine, but the ordinance should go further encouraging additional connections to other local and collector roads. For example with the sketch plan floating around there should possibly be another truck access road off Gehman Rd. The ordinance should avoid allowing developments that funnel all traffic into one intersection. Traffic is a major concern in the township.
This sketch plan would create gridlock at Willow Lane and Rt. 100. The LVPC sees this. This should concern Macungie Borough as well. I hope they also provide comments. I know communities are getting fed up with Lower Macungie just doing whatever they want. Upper Milford and Republican Supervisor Rob Sentner in particular has expressed this.
So here we have another opportunity to see what this board does. Do they dig in and double down as they usually do or do they actually react to a comment by the LVPC. They rarely change ordinances after they are advertised.
Jaindl timeline… open and transparent process?
We have to remember what transpired in 2010 at the polls.
The train was very clearly on the tracks and no amount of public comment was going to change the Commissioners pre-determined outcome. Nothing demonstrates this better then the memo below which became public record during the court proceedings.
The outcome was pre-determined the minute the board stepped into confidential executive sessions and negotiated a terrible alternative plan to a threatened quarry. Never were residents given a chance to weigh in on Quarry vs. Fight a Quarry vs. Warehouses/strip malls and residential in a meaningful way. This outcome was always predetermined, complete with timeline.
This is Ron Eichenberg, Ryan Conrad and Roger Reis’s version of engaging residents in a transparent process.
Strongtowns.org to host Smart Growth discussion in LMT
On January 9th ‘strongtowns.org’ will host a curbside chat in Lower Macungie. The strongtowns message focuses on new strategies for the economic realities that face our communities.
Strongtowns compares ‘growth as the magic bullet’ policy to a ponzi scheme. This occurs when municipalities swap near term cash advantage for long term financial obligations. Stop and think about it for a second. We have officials who publicly support the Jaindl development by claiming we “need the taxbase”. Same can be said for Hamilton Crossings or the Allen Organ supermarket/apartment project. Ask yourself one simple question, after two decades of supercharged growth how can we possibly still need more taxbase. When does it end? Does it ever end?
As we approach total build out how do we begin to position ourselves for long term resiliency? What happens when there are no more greenfields and the developers have moved on to the next ‘green pasture’ and the long term infrastructure obligations must be maintained or replaced by township taxdollars. What happens when we need another fire station, a police dept, upgraded stormwater systems or a new High School? How do we continue to pay for all this without a massive tax increase?
Thats the core issue strongtowns focuses on.They support growing in a fiscally sustainable fashion where projects are reviewed from a lifecycle cost benefit and quality of life analysis. They advocate for analyzing the status quo not blindly doubling down on it. Strategy that leads to financial sustainability not policy that relies on perpetual growth.
I hope to see you at this presentation. It’s certainly very thought provoking and relevant to the issues we as a community face now and moving forward.
Strongtowns.org presents a ‘curbside chat’
Date: January 9thWhere: Lower Macungie Township Building
3400 Brookside RoadTime: 8:00-9:30 AM
Local Gov’t 101 – What is the Township BOC?
First in a continuing series outlining our various levels of local government in the greater East Penn area and how you can get involved in the decision making process!
What is the Township Board of Commissioners?
Lower Macungie is a township which is a level of local government. (Municipality) Local municipalities in Pennsylvania are either cities (like Allentown) Boroughs (like Emmaus or Macungie) or Townships. (Like Upper Milford or Upper Macungie)
Municipality -> County -> State -> Federal Gov’t
In Lower Macungie we’re governed by a board of 5 elected officials. The LMT BOC. In 2009 after a resident led advocacy effort we became a first class township. Previously we were 2nd. The difference is the organization. When we were 2nd class we elected 3 Supervisors. An argument was made by supporters (myself included) that a 1st class township is a more effective and transparent form of gov’t for a township as large as ours. In 2009 voters agreed 60-40% and we switched to 1st class.
Commissioners are responsible for policy items such as setting the property tax rate, guiding growth policy, overseeing our park system and supervision of the professional staff including our planner, zoning officer, code enforcement officer and public works staff. Some hot button topics that will be discussed in the coming months include police protection, Smart Growth, storm water management and walkability.
To put it into practical terms that affect all homeowners, when you pay your tax bill, 3 local bodies have their “hand” in it. The School District, the county and your local municipality. Growth decisions made in LMT also affect the school district in terms of enrollment and taxes. Land development decisions affect our taxes and our quality of life. Regulatory issues affect renters, homeowners and businesses in the township.
Commissioners serve on various committees that reflect other responsibilities. These were setup during the conversion to 1st class to make the decision making process more transparent. These include: Public Safety, Planning and Zoning, Public Works and General Administration. Some of these committees coincide with volunteer commissions and boards such as Parks & Recreation, Public Safety and Planning. These resident commissions advise make formal recommendations to the board. These are setup so that residents can attend these meetings to discuss concerns with commissioners in a less formal setting then a full board meeting.
How to get involved! Resident participation is key to local Government. Far too often residents become aware of issues when it’s too late. (Jaindl) It’s been my mission the last 2 years to ensure residents are aware of hot button topics. It’s very easy to get involved. In fact, our first class township is setup to be hands on. There are various committees and commissions residents can volunteer on. The township website always posts updates on what positions are available. You can fill out volunteer forms at any time and the township secretary will keep it on file and alert you when a position opens up.
Board of Commissioner meetings are the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of the month at 7pm. Committee and Commission meetings are always posted on the township calendar.
LMT Facts:
24 Square Miles
Over 30,000 residents (larger the the city of Easton!)
One of the fastest growing Municipalities in the State (40% growth over last 2 decades)
Next week: East Penn Borough Governments (Emmaus, Alburtis and Macungie)
My letter to Commissioners re: Walkability Willow Lane Elementary Corridor.

A Stalker Board in conjunction with 15 MPH speed limit school zone. Stalker boards tell residents their speed and alert them to slow down if they are over 15MPH when the light is flashing.
Commissioners,
- Considering stalker boards in conjunction with all 15mph lights and the long overdue school zone designation on roads where students will be entering the campus with priority on Willow Lane since it is a 35 MPH road.
- Considering raised crosswalks on the interior of the school campus (This would be a EPSD responsibility)
- Consider Lighted LED crosswalks similar to the borough of Macungie with a priority on Willow and Saurkraut.
- Considering pedestrian refuge medians at appropriate crosswalks not located at intersections. (I believe there is one suggested by the district study on Saurkraut)
This is an opportunity to not only ensure students and parents safety but to support walkers and walkability in general. This board has on many occasions expressed support for walkable communities. There is no doubt that this corridor is very popular for bikers, walkers and runners of all types. Please consider these options when developing a safety plan for this corridor. These enhancements support the idea of our connector roads not just being mechanisms for shuttling cars but being complete streets (a tool of smart growth) that truly link our neighborhoods.